Commissioned Research
Policies & Practices
Teacher Leadership
Accomplished Teaching
Meet the Board
Resources & Reading
Upcoming Events
Contact Us
Home


Impact Studies

 
ARTICLES TO VIEW ON THIS PAGE:


"Learning from the National Board Portfolio Process: What Teachers Discovered about Literacy Teaching and Learning"


First Large-scale Report Which Shows that Students Learn More From NBPTS

National Board Demonstrates Impact On Student Learning

"Constructivist Teaching and Student Achievement: The Results of a School-level Classroom Observation Study in Washington"


"Learning from the National Board Portfolio Process: What Teachers Discovered about Literacy Teaching and Learning"
explores the professional growth of teachers as National Board candidates. Eight case studies detail the changes in instruction and practice that these teachers experience because they took advantage of this opportunity to learn.

The most essential change came in the form of purposeful instruction. Teachers resoundingly stated that their instructional methods became more intentional and well planned as they aligned their goals, instruction and assessment. They used more planning tools, wrote and mapped out units prior to instruction and collaborated or observed other teachers. By avoiding using the same lessons they have used for years or ignoring the latest trend, they saw real strides in student learning. Aligning goals, instruction and assessment and sharing expectations with students made their teaching more intentional and motivated students because they knew what was expected of them and rose to the challenge.

To read the executive summary click here (pdf 9.56K). To read the complete text click here (pdf 148K).


First Large-scale Report Which Shows that Students Learn More From NBPTS

Dan Goldhaber, a researcher for the UW Center on Reinventing Public Education just published a report
that "provides the first large-scale evidence on whether or not NBPTS certification successfully identified teachers who will raise student achievement..... Controlling for a wide range of variables, the researchers find that National Board Certified Teachers:

- are more effective at raising student achievement than teachers who pursue, but fail to obtain, NBPTS certification
- are more effective at raising student achievement outside of the year in which they apply than teachers who do not pursue NBPTS certification
- have a greater impact with younger students
- have a greater impact with low-income students

To read more, here are links directly to the press release and the report summary:

http://www.crpe.org/workingpapers/pdf/NBPTSquality_release.pdf

http://www.crpe.org/workingpapers/pdf/NBPTSquality_brief.pdf

The working paper is 43 pages long:

http://www.crpe.org/workingpapers/pdf/NBPTSquality_report.pdf


National Board Demonstrates Impact On Student Learning
By Allan Morasch

TEACHERS SAY

The National Board process, through the sharing of knowledge, materials, curriculum and experiences, has helped many teachers gravitate to leadership roles within their departments, schools, districts, the community at large and even at the state level.

ADMINISTRATORS SAY

For the greatest number of principals interviewed, the National Board process proved to be one of the most effective tools available for increasing teacher competence, thereby increasing student learning, and, most of all, boosting their entire school through the teacher leadership that was most often a result of participation in the program. They cited benefits to the whole school, the provision of incentives for keeping excellent teachers in the classroom, and the power of professional reflection for improving student learning.

For a short summary of the study, click here

For the full report, click here (PDF 336 KB)


"Constructivist Teaching and Student Achievement: The Results of a School-level Classroom Observation Study in Washington"

Jeffrey Fouts, PhD. Washington School Research Center February 2003

http://www.spu.edu/orgs/research/currentresearch.html

WSRC observed almost seven hundred classrooms in thirty-four schools in Washington State to answer the question, “ Can constructivist teaching predict school-level achievement beyond the effects of low income?”

Findings:

**Relationship between family income and student achievement were expected and consistent with many other studies that used aggregated school-level data (Students in schools with lower family income received less intellectually demanding instruction)

**There was a strong relationship between constructivist teaching practices and student achievement

**The state EALRs and WASL complemented this type of teaching

**17% of classrooms that were observed had strong constructivist teaching

Data sources included:

** Teaching Attributes Observation Protocol (TAOP) which contains seven lesson components

**Holistic scores for each classroom which were combined from the researchers who completed the observations

**School-level WASL scores